Houston expert shares advice for business founders leading dual interest workforces

guest column

A new study shows a mixed workforce — some like the work-life blend and some want to check out of their jobs at 5 pm. How can you design a workplace culture that fits both? Photo via Getty Images

Managers are facing a new challenge after a recent Gallup survey revealed the chasm between work-life splitters and blenders. While splitters prefer a 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. job with a clear divide between work and life, blenders would rather blend work and life throughout the day. Although the increase in hybrid work would seem to benefit blenders, employees are split between the two camps.

This presents an obstacle for managers who want both groups to feel satisfied with their work-life balance. Fortunately, managers do not have to choose between forcing blenders to work certain hours or denying splitters the structure they want. Instead, organizations can accommodate both kinds of employees through establishing clear expectations, introducing flexible scheduling and emphasizing open communication.

Set clear expectations

To meet expectations, employees need to understand them. That includes understanding how their job performance will be evaluated by their managers. However, while many businesses historically evaluated employees on punctuality by signing in at 9 a.m. on the dot every day, hybrid work arrangements have challenged this notion. On many teams, employees can work the hours they choose so long as they work 40 hours in a week. On others, managers may allow employees to set a daily schedule but expect more consistent schedules from week to week.

With that in mind, managers should let employees know what constitutes tardiness and how many hours splitters and blenders are expected to work. If employees need to let managers know ahead of time what hours their working hours each week, then official policy should outline the expectation. On the other hand, if employees can work whatever hours they desire so long as they attend required meetings and hit certain hours every week, managers need to let them know. Otherwise, employees may feel frustrated toward one another or take advantage of flexible arrangements.

Allow flexible scheduling

Flexible scheduling is another solution to the splitters versus blenders dilemma. Though flexible scheduling may not work for every single team, the concept allows employees to choose their own hours, so long as they complete their work and attend mandatory meetings. If fully flexible scheduling is not an option, managers can also allow flex time, such that employees who need to fulfill personal obligations after work can sign on an hour early to sign off an hour early.

Flexible scheduling is also highly popular with workers and could boost morale for teams of splitters and blenders who struggle to collaborate as a result of their different orientations toward work-life balance. In fact, McKinsey's 2022 American Opportunity Survey found 87% of workers will work flexible hours when offered the chance.

The most important aspect of successful flexible scheduling is employees who understand how many hours they need to work and buy into the system. For flexible scheduling to work at its best, employees may need to track their hours. This ensures every employee is working the same total hours every week, making the system feel fair to everyone on the team.

Focus on open communication

The last critical element of managing splitters versus blenders is open communication. In the hybrid era, traditional communication strategies may need updating. A June 2021 Gallup survey found only 7% of U.S. workers would strongly agree communication is accurate, timely and open at their workplace. Where managers once regularly interacted with their teams together at the office, that is no longer the case for businesses with hybrid schedules. As a result, managers may need to take more deliberate action to communicate with regular email updates and employee check-ins, as well as transparent and timely responses to employee concerns.

Each group of workers may encounter challenges due to their preferred work-life balance. For instance, a blender may struggle to attend an early morning meeting on time due to family obligations like childcare. On the other hand, a splitter may resent being asked to work outside of typical business hours. In both cases, managers should encourage their employees to communicate their difficulties with work-life balance and offer their support in solving the problem. Workers need to feel comfortable being proactive, even about uncomfortable subjects like work-life balance. If a manager sees an employee consistently struggling to manage their duties with personal obligations, then it could be time to bring up the issue directly. The sooner the problem is acknowledged and addressed, the sooner it will be resolved.

The emergence of splitters and blenders in the workplace presents an obstacle to managers. With clear expectations, flexible scheduling and open communication, management can solve this challenge of the hybrid era.

------

Jill Chapman is director of early talent programs with Houston-based Insperity, a provider of human resources offering a suite of scalable HR solutions available in the marketplace.
Ad Placement 300x100
Ad Placement 300x600

CultureMap Emails are Awesome

Property Showcase

Texas Republicans are pushing to move NASA headquarters to Houston

space city

Two federal lawmakers from Texas are spearheading a campaign to relocate NASA’s headquarters from Washington, D.C., to the Johnson Space Center in Houston’s Clear Lake area. Houston faces competition on this front, though, as lawmakers from two other states are also vying for this NASA prize.

With NASA’s headquarters lease in D.C. set to end in 2028, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, and U.S. Rep. Brian Babin, a Republican whose congressional district includes the Johnson Space Center, recently wrote a letter to President Trump touting the Houston area as a prime location for NASA’s headquarters.

“A central location among NASA’s centers and the geographical center of the United States, Houston offers the ideal location for NASA to return to its core mission of space exploration and to do so at a substantially lower operating cost than in Washington, D.C.,” the letter states.

Cruz is chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; and Babin is chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Both committees deal with NASA matters. Twenty-five other federal lawmakers from Texas, all Republicans, signed the letter.

In the letter, legislators maintain that shifting NASA’s headquarters to the Houston area makes sense because “a seismic disconnect between NASA’s headquarters and its missions has opened the door to bureaucratic micromanagement and an erosion of [NASA] centers’ interdependence.”

Founded in 1961, the $1.5 billion, 1,620-acre Johnson Space Center hosts NASA’s mission control and astronaut training operations. More than 12,000 employees work at the 100-building complex.

According to the state comptroller, the center generates an annual economic impact of $4.7 billion for Texas, and directly and indirectly supports more than 52,000 public and private jobs.

In pitching the Johnson Space Center for NASA’s HQ, the letter points out that Texas is home to more than 2,000 aerospace, aviation, and defense-related companies. Among them are Elon Musk’s SpaceX, based in the newly established South Texas town of Starbase; Axiom Space and Intuitive Machines, both based in Houston; and Firefly Aerospace, based in the Austin suburb of Cedar Park.

The letter also notes the recent creation of the Texas Space Commission, which promotes innovation in the space and commercial aerospace sectors.

Furthermore, the letter cites Houston-area assets for NASA such as:

  • A strong business environment.
  • A low level of state government regulation.
  • A cost of living that’s half of what it is in the D.C. area.

“Moving the NASA headquarters to Texas will create more jobs, save taxpayer dollars, and reinvigorate America’s space agency,” the letter says.

Last November, NASA said it was hunting for about 375,000 to 525,000 square feet of office space in the D.C. area to house the agency’s headquarters workforce. About 2,500 people work at the agency’s main offices. NASA’s announcement set off a scramble among three states to lure the agency’s headquarters.

Aside from officials in Texas, politicians in Florida and Ohio are pressing NASA to move its headquarters to their states. Florida and Ohio both host major NASA facilities.

NASA might take a different approach, however. “NASA is weighing closing its headquarters and scattering responsibilities among the states, a move that has the potential to dilute its coordination and influence in Washington,” Politico reported in March.

Meanwhile, Congressional Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Democrat who represents D.C., introduced legislation in March that would prohibit relocating a federal agency’s headquarters (including NASA’s) away from the D.C. area without permission from Congress.

“Moving federal agencies is not about saving taxpayer money and will degrade the vital services provided to all Americans across the country,” Norton said in a news release. “In the 1990s, the Bureau of Land Management moved its wildfire staff out West, only to move them back when Congress demanded briefings on new wildfires.”

Houston research breakthrough could pave way for next-gen superconductors

Quantum Breakthrough

A study from researchers at Rice University, published in Nature Communications, could lead to future advances in superconductors with the potential to transform energy use.

The study revealed that electrons in strange metals, which exhibit unusual resistance to electricity and behave strangely at low temperatures, become more entangled at a specific tipping point, shedding new light on these materials.

A team led by Rice’s Qimiao Si, the Harry C. and Olga K. Wiess Professor of Physics and Astronomy, used quantum Fisher information (QFI), a concept from quantum metrology, to measure how electron interactions evolve under extreme conditions. The research team also included Rice’s Yuan Fang, Yiming Wang, Mounica Mahankali and Lei Chen along with Haoyu Hu of the Donostia International Physics Center and Silke Paschen of the Vienna University of Technology. Their work showed that the quantum phenomenon of electron entanglement peaks at a quantum critical point, which is the transition between two states of matter.

“Our findings reveal that strange metals exhibit a unique entanglement pattern, which offers a new lens to understand their exotic behavior,” Si said in a news release. “By leveraging quantum information theory, we are uncovering deep quantum correlations that were previously inaccessible.”

The researchers examined a theoretical framework known as the Kondo lattice, which explains how magnetic moments interact with surrounding electrons. At a critical transition point, these interactions intensify to the extent that the quasiparticles—key to understanding electrical behavior—disappear. Using QFI, the team traced this loss of quasiparticles to the growing entanglement of electron spins, which peaks precisely at the quantum critical point.

In terms of future use, the materials share a close connection with high-temperature superconductors, which have the potential to transmit electricity without energy loss, according to the researchers. By unblocking their properties, researchers believe this could revolutionize power grids and make energy transmission more efficient.

The team also found that quantum information tools can be applied to other “exotic materials” and quantum technologies.

“By integrating quantum information science with condensed matter physics, we are pivoting in a new direction in materials research,” Si said in the release.

---

This article originally appeared on our sister site, EnergyCapitalHTX.com.

Houston humanoid robotics startup inks new deal to deploy its rugged robots

big deal

Houston-based Persona AI announced the expansion of its operations at the Ion and a major milestone in deploying its humanoid robots.

The company will establish a state-of-the-art development center in the prominent corner suite on the first floor of the Ion, and is slated to begin expansion in June.

“We chose the Ion because it’s more than just a building — it’s a thriving innovation ecosystem,” CEO Nicolaus Radford said in a news release. “This is where Houston’s tech future is being built. It’s a convergence point for the people, energy, and ideas that power our mission to redefine human-machine collaboration. For an industrial, AI-driven robotics company, there’s no better place to scale than in the heart of Houston.”

Persona AI’s new development center will be located in the suite utilized by the Ion Prototyping Lab, managed by TXRX Labs. The IPL will transition its operations to the expanded TXRX facility in the East End Maker Hub, which will allow the lab to grow its team and meet increased demand.

At the start of the year, Persona AI closed $25 million in pre-seed funding. Earlier this month, the company announced a memorandum of understanding with HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering, HD Hyundai Robotic, and Korean manufacturing firm Vazil Company to create and deploy humanoid robots for complex welding tasks in shipyards.

The project will deliver prototype humanoids by the end of 2026, with field testing and full commercial deployment scheduled to begin in 2027.

"As heavy industry faces growing labor constraints—especially in high-risk trades like welding—the need for rugged, autonomous humanoid robots is more urgent than ever,” Radford added in a separate statement. “This partnership with HD Hyundai and Vazil is more than symbolic—deploying to the shipyard is one of the largest real-world proving grounds for Persona's tough, humanoid robots.”

View All Listings