A new study shows a mixed workforce — some like the work-life blend and some want to check out of their jobs at 5 pm. How can you design a workplace culture that fits both? Photo via Getty Images

Managers are facing a new challenge after a recent Gallup survey revealed the chasm between work-life splitters and blenders. While splitters prefer a 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. job with a clear divide between work and life, blenders would rather blend work and life throughout the day. Although the increase in hybrid work would seem to benefit blenders, employees are split between the two camps.

This presents an obstacle for managers who want both groups to feel satisfied with their work-life balance. Fortunately, managers do not have to choose between forcing blenders to work certain hours or denying splitters the structure they want. Instead, organizations can accommodate both kinds of employees through establishing clear expectations, introducing flexible scheduling and emphasizing open communication.

Set clear expectations

To meet expectations, employees need to understand them. That includes understanding how their job performance will be evaluated by their managers. However, while many businesses historically evaluated employees on punctuality by signing in at 9 a.m. on the dot every day, hybrid work arrangements have challenged this notion. On many teams, employees can work the hours they choose so long as they work 40 hours in a week. On others, managers may allow employees to set a daily schedule but expect more consistent schedules from week to week.

With that in mind, managers should let employees know what constitutes tardiness and how many hours splitters and blenders are expected to work. If employees need to let managers know ahead of time what hours their working hours each week, then official policy should outline the expectation. On the other hand, if employees can work whatever hours they desire so long as they attend required meetings and hit certain hours every week, managers need to let them know. Otherwise, employees may feel frustrated toward one another or take advantage of flexible arrangements.

Allow flexible scheduling

Flexible scheduling is another solution to the splitters versus blenders dilemma. Though flexible scheduling may not work for every single team, the concept allows employees to choose their own hours, so long as they complete their work and attend mandatory meetings. If fully flexible scheduling is not an option, managers can also allow flex time, such that employees who need to fulfill personal obligations after work can sign on an hour early to sign off an hour early.

Flexible scheduling is also highly popular with workers and could boost morale for teams of splitters and blenders who struggle to collaborate as a result of their different orientations toward work-life balance. In fact, McKinsey's 2022 American Opportunity Survey found 87% of workers will work flexible hours when offered the chance.

The most important aspect of successful flexible scheduling is employees who understand how many hours they need to work and buy into the system. For flexible scheduling to work at its best, employees may need to track their hours. This ensures every employee is working the same total hours every week, making the system feel fair to everyone on the team.

Focus on open communication

The last critical element of managing splitters versus blenders is open communication. In the hybrid era, traditional communication strategies may need updating. A June 2021 Gallup survey found only 7% of U.S. workers would strongly agree communication is accurate, timely and open at their workplace. Where managers once regularly interacted with their teams together at the office, that is no longer the case for businesses with hybrid schedules. As a result, managers may need to take more deliberate action to communicate with regular email updates and employee check-ins, as well as transparent and timely responses to employee concerns.

Each group of workers may encounter challenges due to their preferred work-life balance. For instance, a blender may struggle to attend an early morning meeting on time due to family obligations like childcare. On the other hand, a splitter may resent being asked to work outside of typical business hours. In both cases, managers should encourage their employees to communicate their difficulties with work-life balance and offer their support in solving the problem. Workers need to feel comfortable being proactive, even about uncomfortable subjects like work-life balance. If a manager sees an employee consistently struggling to manage their duties with personal obligations, then it could be time to bring up the issue directly. The sooner the problem is acknowledged and addressed, the sooner it will be resolved.

The emergence of splitters and blenders in the workplace presents an obstacle to managers. With clear expectations, flexible scheduling and open communication, management can solve this challenge of the hybrid era.

------

Jill Chapman is director of early talent programs with Houston-based Insperity, a provider of human resources offering a suite of scalable HR solutions available in the marketplace.
Ad Placement 300x100
Ad Placement 300x600

CultureMap Emails are Awesome

17 Houston entrepreneurs named finalists in annual regional competition

on to the next round

Entrepreneurs from the Houston area have been named finalists for one of the region’s most prestigious business awards.

The 17 finalists are competing for Ernst & Young’s Entrepreneur Of The Year 2024 Gulf South Award. The Gulf South region includes parts of Texas, along with Louisiana and Mississippi.

An independent panel of judges selected the 48 finalists. Contenders were evaluated based on their demonstration of building long-term value through factors such as entrepreneurial spirit, purpose, growth, and impact.

The Houston-area finalists are:

  • Shannon Payne, Allied Fire Protection, Pearland
  • Jay McEntire IV, Arva Intelligence, Houston
  • Andrew Levy, Avelo Airlines, Houston
  • Derek Maetzold, Castle Biosciences, Friendswood
  • Scott Aronstein, Connectivity Source, Houston
  • Joshua Weisman, Construction Concepts, Houston
  • Feras Moussa and Ben Suttles, Disrupt Equity, Houston
  • John Poindexter, J.B. Poindexter, Houston
  • James Ross, LJA Engineering, Houston
  • Asher Kazmann, Locke Solutions, Houston
  • Chad Millis, Millis, Missouri City
  • Mike Francis, NanoTech Materials, Houston
  • Stuart Hinchen and Peter Jenkins, Quva Pharma, Sugar Land
  • Trevor Best and Suman Khatiwada, Syzygy Plasmonics, Houston
  • Hal Brumfield, Tachus Fiber Internet, The Woodlands
  • Jared Boudreaux, Vector Controls and Automation Group, Pearland
  • Ting Qiao, Wan Bridge, Houston

“The finalists of this year are audacious entrepreneurs who are making a significant impact in their respective industries and communities,” says Anna Horndahl, an EY partner and co-director of the EOY Gulf South Program.

“These pioneers, chosen by an independent panel of judges, showcase relentless commitment to their businesses, customers and communities. We are thrilled to acknowledge their accomplishments,” adds Travis Garms, an EY partner and co-director of the EOY Gulf South Program.

Houston makes top 10 list of metros with most millionaires

living large

Anew population analysis has unveiled an exclusive view into how the elite live in the U.S., including a surprising discovery that Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land has the No. 9 highest concentration of millionaire households in the country.

The study by online real estate marketplace Point2Homes compared household data among millionaires in the 30 biggest U.S. metropolitan areas, including four Texas metros, between 2017 and 2022.

The report found that the number of U.S. households that earned at least $1 million a year more than quadruped within the five-year period, with the highest concentration of millionaire households located in the New York-Newark-Jersey City area across New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.

There are just under 2,900 millionaire homeowners living across the Houston metro, making up 0.11 percent of all households in the area. The report revealed a majority (32.9 percent) of millionaires in Houston are actually Gen Xers, with the second highest share going to baby boomers (28.9 percent).

Most interestingly, the youngest generation, Gen Z, make up 15.4 percent of all millionaire households in Houston, with millennials making up 21.5 percent, according to the report. But the Gen Z percentage is misleading; as the report clarifies, there aren't actually that many Gen Z millionaires walking among us in H-Town.

"Instead, this high share is most likely almost entirely due to the people aged 15 to 24 who are still living with their (millionaire) owner parents," the report explained. "Unfortunately, living in a millionaire owner household does not a millionaire owner make — but it does come with some serious perks."

Physicians make up Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land millionaires' main occupations across all age groups, the study also found.

This is how Houston's millionaires live
The saying goes, "Go big or go home," and Houston's millionaire homeowners are taking that to heart when it comes to their own lavish households.

The report discovered the typical home owned by a millionaire in Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land is a five bedroom, nine total-room house, with an average assessed value of $1,466,682. As for wheels, a Houston-based millionaire is likely to have less than three vehicles (2.8) on average.

By comparison, the average value for a millionaire homeowner's abode in San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, California is $2,816,196, the highest amount out of all 30 U.S. metros in the report.

Big, expensive homes don't come without big costs to maintain them, the report reminds. And when it comes to managing finances for wealthy earners, making more money doesn't necessarily mean they'll be saving that income.

"Rather, it just means bigger homes with bigger mortgages and maintenance expenses; more cars; much costlier schools; and more over-the-top lifestyles, which simply bite bigger chunks out of the family's big budget," the report said. "However, despite the 'risks,' most of us would probably choose to have rich people problems. Or, as the saying goes, crying in a Ferrari might just feel better than crying in a Toyota when all is said and done."

Millionaire lifestyles across Texas
In a comparison of all Texas metro areas, Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land claimed the highest share of millionaire homeowners statewide. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington took the No. 2 spot, while Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown rounded out the top three. San Antonio-New Braunfels took No. 4 in the statewide analysis.

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington was right behind Houston in the national standings, ranking No. 10, with nearly 2,650 millionaire households situated in the Metroplex. DFW's millionaires are mainly chief executives and legislators, or physicians. Gen Xers (44.1 percent) make up the highest share of the metro's millionaires, with baby boomers (24.7 percent) not too far behind.

Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown, however, fell to No. 24 in the national ranking with only 749 millionaire households calling the Texas Capital home. Austin's millionaires are mainly chief executives and legislators, or other types of high-level mangers. Gen Xers (34.9 percent) make up the highest share of the metro's millionaires, with millennials (30.8 percent) not too far behind.

San Antonio-New Braunfels ranked at the bottom of the study at No. 29, above Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. There were only 414 millionaire households in the metro area between 2017-2022, and a majority of them (38.4 percent) were Gen X physicians.

The top 10 metros with the highest share of millionaires in the U.S. are:

  • No. 1 – New York-Newark-New Jersey City, New York-New Jersey-Pennsylvania
  • No. 2 – Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, California
  • No. 3 – San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, California
  • No. 4 – Boston-Cambridge-Newton, Massachusetts-New Hampshire
  • No. 5 – Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, D.C.-Virginia-Marland-West Virginia
  • No. 6 – Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin
  • No. 7 – Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, Florida
  • No. 8 – Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Washington
  • No. 9 – Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Texas
  • No. 10 – Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas

The full report and its methodology can be found on point2homes.com.

------

This article originally ran on CultureMap.