A new study shows a mixed workforce — some like the work-life blend and some want to check out of their jobs at 5 pm. How can you design a workplace culture that fits both? Photo via Getty Images

Managers are facing a new challenge after a recent Gallup survey revealed the chasm between work-life splitters and blenders. While splitters prefer a 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. job with a clear divide between work and life, blenders would rather blend work and life throughout the day. Although the increase in hybrid work would seem to benefit blenders, employees are split between the two camps.

This presents an obstacle for managers who want both groups to feel satisfied with their work-life balance. Fortunately, managers do not have to choose between forcing blenders to work certain hours or denying splitters the structure they want. Instead, organizations can accommodate both kinds of employees through establishing clear expectations, introducing flexible scheduling and emphasizing open communication.

Set clear expectations

To meet expectations, employees need to understand them. That includes understanding how their job performance will be evaluated by their managers. However, while many businesses historically evaluated employees on punctuality by signing in at 9 a.m. on the dot every day, hybrid work arrangements have challenged this notion. On many teams, employees can work the hours they choose so long as they work 40 hours in a week. On others, managers may allow employees to set a daily schedule but expect more consistent schedules from week to week.

With that in mind, managers should let employees know what constitutes tardiness and how many hours splitters and blenders are expected to work. If employees need to let managers know ahead of time what hours their working hours each week, then official policy should outline the expectation. On the other hand, if employees can work whatever hours they desire so long as they attend required meetings and hit certain hours every week, managers need to let them know. Otherwise, employees may feel frustrated toward one another or take advantage of flexible arrangements.

Allow flexible scheduling

Flexible scheduling is another solution to the splitters versus blenders dilemma. Though flexible scheduling may not work for every single team, the concept allows employees to choose their own hours, so long as they complete their work and attend mandatory meetings. If fully flexible scheduling is not an option, managers can also allow flex time, such that employees who need to fulfill personal obligations after work can sign on an hour early to sign off an hour early.

Flexible scheduling is also highly popular with workers and could boost morale for teams of splitters and blenders who struggle to collaborate as a result of their different orientations toward work-life balance. In fact, McKinsey's 2022 American Opportunity Survey found 87% of workers will work flexible hours when offered the chance.

The most important aspect of successful flexible scheduling is employees who understand how many hours they need to work and buy into the system. For flexible scheduling to work at its best, employees may need to track their hours. This ensures every employee is working the same total hours every week, making the system feel fair to everyone on the team.

Focus on open communication

The last critical element of managing splitters versus blenders is open communication. In the hybrid era, traditional communication strategies may need updating. A June 2021 Gallup survey found only 7% of U.S. workers would strongly agree communication is accurate, timely and open at their workplace. Where managers once regularly interacted with their teams together at the office, that is no longer the case for businesses with hybrid schedules. As a result, managers may need to take more deliberate action to communicate with regular email updates and employee check-ins, as well as transparent and timely responses to employee concerns.

Each group of workers may encounter challenges due to their preferred work-life balance. For instance, a blender may struggle to attend an early morning meeting on time due to family obligations like childcare. On the other hand, a splitter may resent being asked to work outside of typical business hours. In both cases, managers should encourage their employees to communicate their difficulties with work-life balance and offer their support in solving the problem. Workers need to feel comfortable being proactive, even about uncomfortable subjects like work-life balance. If a manager sees an employee consistently struggling to manage their duties with personal obligations, then it could be time to bring up the issue directly. The sooner the problem is acknowledged and addressed, the sooner it will be resolved.

The emergence of splitters and blenders in the workplace presents an obstacle to managers. With clear expectations, flexible scheduling and open communication, management can solve this challenge of the hybrid era.

------

Jill Chapman is director of early talent programs with Houston-based Insperity, a provider of human resources offering a suite of scalable HR solutions available in the marketplace.
Ad Placement 300x100
Ad Placement 300x600

CultureMap Emails are Awesome

Houston biotech co. raises $11M to advance ALS drug development

drug money

Houston-based clinical-stage biotechnology company Coya Therapeutics (NASDAQ: COYA) has raised $11.1 million in a private investment round.

India-based pharmaceuticals company Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Inc. led the round with a $10 million investment, according to a news release. New York-based investment firm Greenlight Capital, Coya’s largest institutional shareholder, contributed $1.1 million.

The funding was raised through a definitive securities purchase agreement for the purchase and sale of more than 2.5 million shares of Coya's common stock in a private placement at $4.40 per share.

Coya reports that it plans to use the proceeds to scale up manufacturing of low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2), which is a component of its COYA 302 and will support the commercial readiness of the drug. COYA 302 enhances anti-inflammatory T cell function and suppresses harmful immune activity for treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease.

The company received FDA acceptance for its investigational new drug application for COYA 302 for treating ALS and FTD this summer. Its ALSTARS Phase 2 clinical trial for ALS treatment launched this fall in the U.S. and Canada and has begun enrolling and dosing patients. Coya CEO Arun Swaminathan said in a letter to investors that the company also plans to advance its clinical programs for the drug for FTD therapy in 2026.

Coya was founded in 2021. The company merged with Nicoya Health Inc. in 2020 and raised $10 million in its series A the same year. It closed its IPO in January 2023 for more than $15 million. Its therapeutics uses innovative work from Houston Methodist's Dr. Stanley H. Appel.

New accelerator for AI startups to launch at Houston's Ion this spring

The Collectiv Foundation and Rice University have established a sports, health and wellness startup accelerator at the Ion District’s Collectiv, a sports-focused venture capital platform.

The AI Native Dual-Use Sports, Health & Wellness Accelerator, scheduled to formally launch in March, will back early-stage startups developing AI for the sports, health and wellness markets. Accelerator participants will gain access to a host of opportunities with:

  • Mentors
  • Advisers
  • Pro sports teams and leagues
  • University athletics programs
  • Health care systems
  • Corporate partners
  • VC firms
  • Pilot projects
  • University-based entrepreneurship and business initiatives

Accelerator participants will focus on sports tech verticals inlcuding performance and health, fan experience and media platforms, data and analytics, and infrastructure.

“Houston is quickly becoming one of the most important innovation hubs at the intersection of sports, health, and AI,” Ashley DeWalt, co-founder and managing partner of The Collectiv and founder of The Collectiv Foundation, said in a news release.

“By launching this platform with Rice University in the Ion District,” he added, “we are building a category-defining acceleration engine that gives founders access to world-class research, global sports properties, hospital systems, and venture capital. This is about turning sports-validated technology into globally scalable companies at a moment when the world’s attention is converging on Houston ahead of the 2026 World Cup.”

The Collectiv accelerator will draw on expertise from organizations such as the Rice-Houston Methodist Center for Human Performance, Rice Brain Institute, Rice Gateway Project and the Texas Medical Center.

“The combination of Rice University’s research leadership, Houston’s unmatched health ecosystem, and The Collectiv’s operator-driven investment platform creates a powerful acceleration engine,” Blair Garrou, co-founder and managing partner of the Mercury Fund VC firm and a senior adviser for The Collectiv, added in the release.

Additional details on programming, partners and application timelines are expected to be announced in the coming weeks.

4 Houston-area schools excel with best online degree programs in U.S.

Top of the Class

Four Houston-area universities have earned well-deserved recognition in U.S. News & World Report's just-released rankings of the Best Online Programs for 2026.

The annual rankings offer insight into the best American universities for students seeking a flexible and affordable way to attain a higher education. In the 2026 edition, U.S. News analyzed nearly 1,850 online programs for bachelor's degrees and seven master's degree disciplines: MBA, business (non-MBA), criminal justice, education, engineering, information technology, and nursing.

Many of these local schools are also high achievers in U.S. News' separate rankings of the best grad schools.

Rice University tied with Texas A&M University in College Station for the No. 3 best online master's in information technology program in the U.S., and its online MBA program ranked No. 21 nationally.

The online master's in nursing program at The University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston was the highest performing master's nursing degree in Texas, and it ranked No. 19 nationally.

Three different programs at The University of Houston were ranked among the top 100 nationwide:
  • No. 18 – Best online master's in education
  • No. 59 – Best online master's in business (non-MBA)
  • No. 89 – Best online bachelor's program
The University of Houston's Clear Lake campus ranked No. 65 nationally for its online master's in education program.

"Online education continues to be a vital path for professionals, parents, and service members seeking to advance their careers and broaden their knowledge with necessary flexibility," said U.S. News education managing editor LaMont Jones in a press release. "The 2026 Best Online Programs rankings are an essential tool for prospective students, providing rigorous, independent analysis to help them choose a high-quality program that aligns with their personal and professional goals."

A little farther outside Houston, two more universities – Sam Houston State University in Huntsville and Texas A&M University in College Station – stood out for their online degree programs.

Sam Houston State University

  • No. 5 – Best online master's in criminal justice
  • No. 30 – Best online master's in information technology
  • No. 36 – Best online master's in education
  • No. 77 – Best online bachelor's program
  • No. 96 – Best online master's in business (non-MBA)
Texas A&M University
  • No. 3 – Best online master's in information technology (tied with Rice)
  • No. 3 – Best online master's in business (non-MBA)
  • No. 8 – Best online master's in education
  • No. 9 – Best online master's in engineering
  • No. 11 – Best online bachelor's program
---

This article originally appeared on CultureMap.com.