Houston founder on the power of trivia when it comes to reliable education

guest column

When it comes to innovation within education, trivia has a role to play, says this Houston edtech startup founder. Photo via Getty Images

Recently, our focus shifted towards quizzing — how to assess knowledge and retain information in the most innovative way possible. Personally, we are not in favor of low-level questions that simply rely on cramming, as they block away creativity. The primary motivation of traditional learning is punitive with high demands of simply, making the students read the content.

Castrophying effective learning with poor teaching methods has caused a stir of poor performance despite raging talent, the students perform badly. The question is why? Is quizzing not the proper assessment tool? Before we jump onto the bandwagon, let's understand the power of effective learning.

Effective learning and trivia

Using technological, societal, and cultural trends to upgrade from traditional white-board methods towards evolving modern technology is what leads to effective learning. With UpBrainery, we focus on technological advancements that personalize the experience to meet the unique needs and preferences of individual learners. The goal is to combine different strategies and approaches, including personalized learning, collaborative learning, multimodal learning, and accessible learning. These approaches may incorporate a variety of tools and technologies, such as adaptive learning platforms, online collaboration tools, virtual and augmented reality, and assistive technologies for learners with disabilities.

That being said, trivia can certainly be a valuable addition to a well-rounded learning approach. It can help learners stay engaged and motivated, while also stimulating memory, attention, creativity, and learning transfer. In the future, we may see more innovative and interactive forms of trivia-based learning, as well as new tools and technologies for supporting cognitive development and effective learning in a variety of contexts. How cool will that be?

Trivia and cognitive processes

Cognition refers to the mental processes involved in acquiring, processing, and using knowledge. Trivia can be a fun and engaging way to help individuals improve their memory skills.

By learning and recalling new facts, individuals can strengthen their ability to store and retrieve information, which can support learning and problem-solving in other areas. It helps individuals improve their attention skills by requiring them to focus on new information and recall it quickly. This can be particularly helpful for individuals with attention deficit disorders or other challenges that make it difficult to stay focused for extended periods of time.

Furthermore, it stimulates creativity by encouraging individuals to think outside the box and come up with new ways of connecting and interpreting information. By exploring new facts and ideas, individuals can develop their ability to generate new insights and solutions to problems. Finally, trivia can help individuals transfer learning from one context to another. By learning new facts and ideas in a trivia context, individuals can develop their ability to apply that knowledge in other areas of their lives, such as work or school.

Overall, while trivia may not be a complete substitute for other learning methods, it can be a valuable tool for supporting and enhancing learning in a variety of contexts.

Trivia in classroom

Through research and incorporating trivia as a source of effective learning, we have gathered a few ways how to support learning in different contexts:

1. Classroom learning: Trivia can be used to support classroom learning by introducing interesting and unusual facts that relate to the topic being studied. For example, if students are learning about the solar system, a teacher could share trivia facts about each planet to help students remember key characteristics.

2. Online learning: Trivia can be used in online learning environments to add an element of fun and engagement to the material. For example, an online course on history could include trivia quizzes at the end of each module to help learners reinforce their understanding and test their knowledge.

3. Study groups: Trivia can be a useful tool for study groups to review material and prepare for exams. By creating trivia questions that cover key concepts and facts, study groups can help each other reinforce their understanding and identify areas where they may need additional support.

4. Corporate training: Trivia can be used in corporate training programs to make the material more engaging and memorable. For example, a training session on customer service could include trivia questions that relate to common customer service scenarios and help employees to remember key principles and best practices.

5. Personal learning: Trivia can be a fun and engaging way to learn new information on a personal level. For example, if you are interested in a particular topic, you could challenge yourself to learn a certain number of trivia facts about it each day or week, helping you to deepen your understanding and expand your knowledge base.

With that being said...

Trivia can be a fun and engaging way to learn new facts and information across a wide range of topics. It increases student participation, improves test scores, lowers failure rates, and overall boosts overall motivation and the will to learn more. With this in mind, at UpBrainery Technologies, we focus on innovative teaching methods to make education fun rather than a burden, check out our Brainlab and get access to unlimited resources, and crash courses.

------

Ghazal Qureshi is the founder and CEO of UpBrainery, a Houston-based immersive educational technology platform that taps into neuroscience research-based programs to provide adaptive learning and individualized pathways for students at home or in the classroom.

Ad Placement 300x100
Ad Placement 300x600

CultureMap Emails are Awesome

Property Showcase

NASA revamps Artemis moon landing program by modeling it after Apollo

To the moon

NASA is revamping its Artemis moon exploration program to make it more like the fast-paced Apollo program half a century ago, adding an extra practice flight before attempting a high-risk lunar landing with a crew in two years.

The overhaul in the flight lineup came just days after NASA’s new moon rocket returned to its hangar for more repairs, and a safety panel warned the space agency to scale back its overly ambitious goals for humanity’s first lunar landing since 1972.

Artemis II, a lunar fly-around by four astronauts, is off until at least April because of rocket problems.

The follow-up mission, Artemis III, had been targeting a landing near the moon’s south pole by another pair of astronauts in about three years. But with long gaps between flights and concern growing over the readiness of a lunar lander and moonwalking suits, NASA’s new administrator Jared Isaacman announced that mission would instead focus on launching a lunar lander into orbit around Earth in 2027 for docking practice by astronauts flying in an Orion capsule.

The new plan calls for a moon landing — potentially even two moon landings — by astronauts in 2028.

“Everybody agrees. This is the only way forward,” Isaacman said.

The hydrogen fuel leaks and helium flow problems that struck the Space Launch System rocket on the pad at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in February also plagued the first Artemis test flight without a crew in 2022.

Another three-year gap was looming between Artemis II and the moon landing by astronauts as originally envisioned, Isaacman said.

Isaacman stressed that “it should be incredibly obvious” that three years between flights is unacceptable. He'd like to get it down to one year or even less.

Isaacman, a tech billionaire who bought his own trips to orbit and performed the world’s first private spacewalk, took the helm at NASA in December.

During NASA’s storied Apollo program, he said, astronauts’ first flight to the moon was followed by two more missions before Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon. What's more, he added, the Apollo moonshots followed one another in quick succession, just as the earlier Projects Mercury and Gemini had rapid flight rates, sometimes coming just a few months apart.

Twenty-four Apollo astronauts flew to the moon from 1968 through 1972, with 12 of them landing.

“No one at NASA forgot their history books. They knew how to do this," Isaacman said. “Now we're putting it in action.”

To pick up the pace and reduce risk, NASA will standardize its Space Launch System rockets moving forward, Isaacman said. These are the massive rockets that will launch astronauts to the moon aboard Orion capsules. At the same time, Elon Musk's SpaceX and Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin are speeding up their work on the landers needed to get the astronauts from lunar orbit down to the surface.

Isaacman said next year will see an Orion crew rendezvousing in orbit around Earth with SpaceX's Starship, Blue Origin's Blue Moon or both landers. It's similar to the methodical approach that worked so well during Apollo in the late 1960s, he noted. Apollo 8, astronauts' first flight to the moon, was followed by two more missions before Armstrong and Aldrin aimed for the lunar surface.

“We should be getting back to basics and doing what we know works,” he said.

The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel recommended that NASA revise its objectives for Artemis III “given the demanding mission goals.” It’s urgent the space agency do that, the panel said, if the United States hopes to safely return astronauts to the moon. Isaacman said the revised Artemis flight plan addresses the panel's concerns and is supported by industry and the Trump administration.

Booming Houston suburb launches innovation grant to attract startups

innovation incentive

Think you’ve got a burgeoning startup? Consider moving it to southwest Houston. The City of Sugar Land announced the Sugar Land Starts Innovation Fund last week to support companies that move jobs to the area.

“The Sugar Land Starts Innovation Fund is designed to support companies that are ready to grow and make a meaningful, long-term commitment to our community,” Colby Millenbruch, business recruitment manager for the City of Sugar Land, said in a news release. “By focusing on revenue-generating startups and performance-based incentives, we are creating a clear pathway for innovative companies to scale while reenergizing existing office space.”

The performance-based, non-equity dilutive grant program is open to companies that demonstrate at least $250,000 in generated revenue or $500,000 in institutional backing from a bank or venture capital firm. They must commit to hiring or relocating at least three employees in Sugar Land for a minimum of three years and at an average salary of $61,240. Compliance will be verified through Texas Workforce Commission reporting.

The fund builds off the Sugar Land Plug and Play partnership to turn the city into an innovative technology hub.

Collaboration with the Silicon Valley-based startup incubator and accelerator on a physical location in southwest Houston has supported 22 startups and has raised $6.5 million in capital since it officially launched in Sugar Land last March. Companies located at the Sugar Land Plug and Play include Synaps, a browser-based design platform for architects, and Intero Biosystems, which produces miniature human organs for preclinical drug development.

In addition to direct funding and business space, both the new grant and the overall Plug and Play project facilitate meetings with Houston-area businesses like CenterPoint Energy.

This should not only bring new industries to Sugar Land, but also allow existing companies to expand outward as technological investors to create a web of new progress.

“This investment is about more than technology. It’s about creating an environment where innovation can take root, grow, and deliver lasting value for the Sugar Land community,” David Steele, director of Texas at Plug and Play, added in the release. “Sugar Land is setting itself apart by taking a long-term view, investing in founders, partnerships, and technologies that will define the next chapter of growth. We’re proud to partner with the city in building an innovation ecosystem that benefits both entrepreneurs and the broader community.”

Income study shows $100,000 salary goes further in Houston in 2026

Money Talk

A 2026 income study has good news for big earners in Houston: A six-figure salary goes further than it did last year.

A Houston resident's $100,000 salary is worth $84,840 after taxes and adjusted for the local cost of living, according to the new financial analysis from SmartAsset. That's about $1,500 more than Houstonians were bringing home last year.

The 2026 take-home pay is about 8 percent higher than it was in 2024, when the same salary had an adjusted value of $78,089.

SmartAsset used its paycheck calculator to apply federal, state and local taxes to an annual salary of $100,000 in 69 of the largest American cities. The figure was then adjusted for the local cost of living (which included average costs for housing, groceries, utilities, transportation, and miscellaneous goods and services). Cities were then ranked based on where a six-figure salary is worth the least after applicable taxes and cost of living adjustments.

Houston ranked No. 60 in the overall ranking of U.S. cities where $100,000 is worth the least. If the rankings were flipped and the cities were ranked based on where $100,000 goes the furthest, that places Houston in the No. 10 spot nationwide.

Manhattan, New York remains the No. 1 city where a six-figure salary is worth the least. A Manhattan resident's take-home pay is only worth $29,420 after taxes and adjusted for the cost of living, which is 3.10 percent lower than it was in 2025.

SmartAsset determined Manhattan has a 29.7 percent effective tax rate on six-figure salaries. Meanwhile, the effective tax rate on a $100,000 salary in Texas (based on the eight cities examined in the report) is 21.1 percent. It's worth highlighting that New York implements a statewide graduated-rate income tax from 4-10.90 percent, whereas Texas is one of only eight states that don't tax residents' income.

Oklahoma City, No. 69, is the U.S. city in the report where a $100,000 salary stretches the furthest. A six-figure salary is worth $91,868 in 2026, up from $89,989 last year.

This is the post-tax value of a $100,000 salary in other Texas cities, and their ranking in the report:

  • Plano (No. 27): $72,653
  • Dallas (No. 47): $80,103
  • Austin (No. 53): $82,446
  • Lubbock (No. 59): $84,567
  • San Antonio (No. 62): $86,419
  • El Paso (No. 67): $90,276
  • Corpus Christi (No. 68): $91,110
According to the report, getting some "financial breathing room" by making six-figures really depends on where someone lives and what their lifestyle is. For residents living in the 42 states that levy some amount of income tax, their take-home pay dwindles further."And depending on how taxes are filed, reaching a $100,000 income may push a household from the 22 percent to 24 percent marginal tax bracket," the report's author wrote. "Meanwhile, locations with high costs across housing and everyday essentials may be less forgiving to a $100,000 income."

---

This article originally appeared on CultureMap.com.

View All Listings